IBM Gets More Time to Answer Second Amended Complaint

Wednesday, March 24 2004 @ 01:25 AM EST

Contributed by: PJ

IBM and SCO have jointly filed a stipulation and motion asking the court for an order giving IBM until the 26th to respond to SCO's Second Amended Complaint.

I know. The suspense is killing me, too.

While you're waiting, you might like to look at LWN's annotated SCO stock price chart. I am not a finance person, so I won't try to tell you what it means, but I found it fascinating.

*******************************************

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
Alan L. Sullivan (3152)
Todd M. Shaghnessy (6651)
[address, phone, fax]

CRAVATH SWAINE & MOORE
Evan R. Chesler (admitted pro hac vice)
David R. Marriott (7572)
[address, phone]

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff
International Business Machines Corporation

____________________________

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

____________________________

THE SCO GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant,

vs.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MACHINES CORPORATION,

Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

__________________________

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Civil No. 2:03CV0294 DAK

Honorable Dale A. Kimball

Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells

________________________

The parties, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and jointly move the Court for an Order enlarging the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. The parties agree that Defendant may have up to and including March 26, 2004, within which to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.

Dated this 19th day of March, 2004.

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
Alan L. Sullivan
Todd M. Shaughnessy

CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE
Evan R. Chesler
David R. Marriott

By _____signature_____
Counsel for Defendant International
Business Machines Corporation

Dated this 19th day of March, 2004

HATCH JAMES & DODGE
Brent O. Hatch
Mark F. James

____(signature)_______
Counsel for Plaintiff

41 comments



http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004032312495449