More Pacer Documents in SCO v. IBM

Wednesday, September 15 2004 @ 05:25 PM EDT

Contributed by: PJ

Unbelievably, there are more documents flying back and forth and more orders letting SCO write long:

[Redacted] Memorandum in Support of SCO's Expedited Motion to Enforce the Court's Amended Scheduling Order Dated June 10, 2004

SCO's Response to IBM's Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File a Response to SCO's Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Discovery and To Continue Hearing Date

IBM's Opposition to SCO's Motion for Additional Time to File Responses to IBM's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment

Order Granting SCO's Motion for Extension to File Response to IBM's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claims and IBM's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Counterclaim for Copyright Infringement (Eighth Counterclaim)

Order Granting Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Over-Length Memorandum

Order Granting Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Over-Length Memorandum

The most interesting are the second and third on the list. You eagle eyes will notice that SCO's redacted memo, first on the list, is the same document they released to the public and the press in an unredacted state. You can compare the language with our text version. Look under the subheading "A.1 IBM's Motion Depends Upon Its Mischaracterization of SCO's Contract Claims" and compare with page 24 of the above document. SCO's unredacted PDF is still on their site.

113 comments



http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040915172509936